MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076050757 · doi:10.2527/jas.2010-3117

The impact of ractopamine hydrochloride on growth and metabolism, with special consideration of its role on nitrogen balance and water utilization in pork production1

2011· article· en· W2076050757 on OpenAlexaff
K.A. Ross, A. D. Beaulieu, J. K. Merrill, G. Vessie, John F. Patience

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPharmacological Effects and Assays
Canadian institutionsCanadian Animal Health InstituteGenome PrairieUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnimal scienceFactorial experimentNutrientRactopamineChemistryNitrogenMetabolismNitrogen balanceDeposition (geology)FecesBiologyBiochemistryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two experiments were conducted to determine if ractopamine hydrochloride (RAC) could improve nutrient utilization and decrease water utilization, thus reducing the environmental footprint of hog operations. The tissue accretion experiment used comparative slaughter involving 120 barrows (95 ± 3 kg of BW), including 12 assigned to an initial slaughter group; the remaining pigs were slaughtered at 108 or 120 kg. Growth performance and nutrient retention were determined. The 15-d metabolism experiment consisted of 54 pigs (95 ± 3 kg of BW). Growth performance, feed and water intake, and urine and fecal output were measured. The metabolism experiment used 9 dietary treatments arranged as a 3 × 3 factorial: 3 quantities of RAC (0, 5, and 10 mg/kg) and 3 standardized ileal digestible-Lys:DE ratios (1.73, 2.14, and 2.63 g/Mcal of DE). The tissue accretion study was designed as a 3 × 3 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments using the same 9 dietary treatments to include slaughter BW (108 and 120 kg of BW) as an additional factor. In the tissue accretion experiment, RAC had no effect on ADG, ADFI, or G:F (P>0.10). With increased Lys, G:F improved (P=0.029), but not ADG or ADFI (P>0.10). Protein deposition rates increased numerically (P=0.11); water deposition rates increased (P=0.050), whereas lipid deposition tended to decrease with RAC inclusion (P=0.055). With greater RAC and Lys, the pigs had improved ADG (P=0.002) and G:F (P<0.001) in the metabolism experiment. Daily water intake (P=0.017.) and water output (P=0.033) decreased with RAC inclusion. Lysine inclusion did not alter the water balance (P>0.10). Urinary N excretion (P<0.001), total N excretion (P=0.003), and the urine N:fecal N ratio (P<0.001) decreased with the addition of RAC; fecal N (P=0.008) increased with RAC inclusion. Retention of N improved with addition of RAC to the diet (P=0.003). With greater dietary Lys, fecal N was reduced (P<0.001). The pigs fed the 2.14 g of Lys/Mcal tended to have the least urinary N (P = 0.069) and total N excretion (P=0.086) and to have the greatest N retention (P=0.086) and urinary N:fecal N ratio (P=0.009). A RAC × Lys interaction was observed for N digestibility (P=0.001), excretion (P=0.001), and retention (P=0.002) and for fecal (P=0.001) and urinary N (P=0.036). By improving N and water utilization in finishing pigs, RAC-containing diets supplemented with sufficient Lys can reduce N excretion into the environment from swine facilities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.467
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicPharmacological Effects and AssaysFrench-language works237,207