MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Review of tools for friction stir welding and processing

2012· article· en· W2076108982 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Metallurgical Quarterly · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Welding Techniques Analysis
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFriction stir weldingMaterials scienceWeldingMetallurgyMicrostructureCreepFormability

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Friction stir welding (FSW) is a novel green manufacturing technique due to its energy efficiency and environmental friendliness. This solid state joining process involves a rotating tool consisting of a shoulder and/or a probe. The shoulder applies a downward pressure to the workpiece surface, constrains the plasticised material around the probe, generates heat through the friction and causes plastic deformation in a relatively thin layer under the bottom surface of the shoulder. The rotating probe mainly drags along, plasticises, and mixes the adjacent material in the stir zone, creating a joint without fusion. Friction stir processing (FSP), a variant of FSW, has been developed to manufacture composites, locally eliminate casting defects, refine microstructure and/or improve the associated mechanical and physical properties including strength, ductility, fatigue, creep, formability and corrosion resistance. However, major challenges such as tool design and wear currently limit the use of FSW/P for manufacturing applications, particularly for high melting temperature or high strength alloys. In this review, the FSW/P tools are briefly summarised in terms of the tool types, shapes, dimensions, materials and wear behaviours.Le soudage par friction-malaxage (SFM) est une technique nouvelle de fabrication verte grâce à son efficacité énergétique et à son amicalité environnementale. Ce procédé d’assemblage à l’état solide implique un outil de rotation constitué d’une épaulement et/ou d'un pion. L’épaulement applique une pression vers le bas sur la surface de la pièce de travail, contraint le matériel plastifié autour du pion, engendre de la chaleur au moyen de la friction, et conduit à la déformation plastique dans une couche relativement mince sous la surface du bas de l’épaulement. Principalement, le pion en rotation entraîne, plastifie et mélange le matériel adjacent dans la zone de mélange, créant une jonction sans fusion. Le traitement par friction-malaxage (TFM), une variante du SFM, a été développé pour fabriquer des composites, pour éliminer localement les défauts de moulage, pour raffiner la microstructure et/ou pour améliorer les propriétés mécaniques et physiques associées, incluant la résistance, la ductilité, la fatigue, le fluage, la formabilité et la résistance à la corrosion. Cependant, des défis majeurs comme le concept de l’outil et l’usure limitent présentement l’utilisation de S/TFM dans les applications de fabrication, particulièrement pour les alliages à haute température de fusion ou à haute résistance mécanique. Dans cet examen, on résume brièvement les outils de S/TFM par rapport aux types d’outils, à leurs formes, à leurs dimensions, aux matériaux et aux comportements d’usure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.971
Threshold uncertainty score0.451

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it