Abstract 34: Investigating PIN1 as a genetic modifier in Li-Fraumeni syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background: Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is characterized by marked clinical heterogeneity in site and age of cancer onset. The prolyl-isomerase, Pin1 (peptidylprolyl cis/trans isomerase, NIMA-interacting 1), has been shown to serve a fundamental role in mutant TP53 oncogenic gain of function and the promotion of aggressive cancer phenotypes. We sought to determine whether alterations in PIN1 modify the phenotype of patients with germline mutations in TP53. Methods: The PIN1 promoter and coding regions were sequenced from peripheral blood lymphocyte samples of 107 individuals with Li-Fraumeni syndrome and documented TP53 mutations. The expression and activity levels of PIN1 were determined in paired patient-derived lymphoblastoid cell lines. Results: Multivariate analysis of PIN1 variants with TP53 mutation status and selected clinical parameters is in progress. A comprehensive summary of observed associations will be presented. Conclusions: Demonstration of a modifying effect of PIN1 on the cancer phenotype conferred by a germline TP53 mutation may aid in the management of patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, including the implementation of patient-specific modifications of surveillance strategies for pre-symptomatic tumor detection. Citation Format: Anita Villani, Ana Novokmet, David Malkin. Investigating PIN1 as a genetic modifier in Li-Fraumeni syndrome. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Cancer Susceptibility and Cancer Susceptibility Syndromes; Jan 29-Feb 1, 2014; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(23 Suppl):Abstract nr 34. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.CANSUSC14-34
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".