MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076194438 · doi:10.1145/1572769.1572789

A directionally adaptive edge anti-aliasing filter

2009· article· en· W2076194438 on OpenAlexaff
Konstantine Iourcha, Jason Yang, Andrew Pomianowski

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsAdvanced Micro Devices (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShaderRendering (computer graphics)Computer scienceAnti-aliasingPixelComputer graphics (images)Computer visionArtificial intelligenceGraphics hardwareFilter (signal processing)Tiled renderingSoftware renderingBilateral filterComputer graphicsComputer hardware3D computer graphics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Figure 1: Steps of the Directionally Adaptive Edge Anti-Aliasing Filter algorithm. The left frame shows geometry edge pixels in the scene determined from the hardware MSAA samples. The center frame represents the gradients at the pixels to be filtered. The right frame is the final image where filtered colors for the pixels in the center image are derived using MSAA samples from a neighborhood of 3x3 pixels and 72 subsample values. (Images generated from Futuremark 3DMark03.) The latest generation of graphics hardware provides direct access to multisample anti-aliasing (MSAA) rendering data. By taking advantage of these existing pixel subsample values, an intelligent reconstruction filter can be computed using programmable GPU shader units. This paper describes an adaptive anti-aliasing (AA) filter for real-time rendering on the GPU. Improved quality is achieved by using information from neighboring pixel samples to compute both an approximation of the gradient of primitive edges and the final pixel color.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.851
Threshold uncertainty score0.237

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Vision and ImagingFrench-language works237,207