Un phénomène majeur : la sociologie de l'éducation et de la formation face à la mondialisation. Discussion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé Le discutant constate que le modèle de la modernité occidentale –école comprise– où l’emporte le modèle de l’État national territorial, a été travesti en normes internationales diffusées comme condition d’intégration des pays du Sud au jeu de la mondialisation. La généralisation d’un modèle idéal unique de l’établissement efficace lui sert à démontrer l’installation partout de formes semblables de gouvernement et de gestion à l’échelon de l’État et du système éducatif. À cet égard, les textes de Hutmacher et de Nyamba sonnent comme une interpellation réciproque. Évolution inexorable dont la sociologie de l’éducation doit dégager les mécanismes et les issues, défi moral et critique posé aux sociologues africains d’une modernisation propre à leurs pays, on ne peut échapper à la gageure d’un projet de construction d’un champ de connaissances et d’une théorie critique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.035 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".