Ovarian Adenosarcoma Arising from Benign Cystadenoma and Associated Intraoperative Consultation Pitfalls
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An unusual case of ovarian adenosarcoma arising from a smooth-walled serous cystadenoma is described. The ovary was replaced by a multiloculated, fluid-filled cyst without any solid or papillary areas. The malignant component was underdiagnosed during frozen section examination as benign cystadenoma because of the deceptively benign gross appearance of the tumor. On the permanent sections, a phyllodes-like pattern of stromal proliferation and periglandular condensation of atypical stromal cells with a mitotic count of 3 per 10 high-power fields was more apparent and led to the diagnosis of adenosarcoma. The malignant component could not be distinguished from the benign component using immunohistochemical analysis. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of an adenosarcoma arising from a grossly benign cystadenoma and the third case in the literature of an adenosarcoma associated with a cystadeno(fibro)ma. This case also shows the challenges in differentiating adenosarcoma from a benign counterpart on both frozen and permanent sections.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".