High-Temperature Laboratory Testing of Illitic Sandstone Outcrop Cores With HCl-Alternative Fluids
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary Illitic sandstone reservoirs are sensitive to hydrochloric-acid (HCl) -based fluids. When HCl contacts illite, it breaks down and causes fines migration and formation damage. The migration of fines through the porous media will block the pores, reduce permeability, and decrease the production rate of oil and gas wells. A thorough literature review showed that all clay minerals are essentially unstable in HCl at temperatures greater than 300°F. In turn, there is a need to search for stimulation fluids other than HCl to stimulate deep sandstone reservoirs. Alternative fluids to HCl/hydrofluoric (HF) mud acids were introduced to stimulate and remove the damage from illitic sandstone reservoirs. These fluids are chelating agents such as hydroxyl ethylene diaminetriacetic acid (HEDTA) and glutamic acid-N,N-diacetic acid (GLDA). In this study, sandstone cores with different illite contents were examined. Illite contents of 1, 10, 14, and 18 wt% of the sandstone cores were used in the coreflood experiments at 300°F. Different combinations of GLDA/HF were tested to determine the optimum ratio of chelate/HF. Computed tomography scans and permeability measurements before and after the treatment were used to assess the effectiveness of each fluid in removing the damage and in the stimulation of the sandstone cores. The results show that 15 wt% HCl caused severe damage to sandstone cores with different illite contents. GLDA and HEDTA solutions showed a good compatibility with the illitic sandstone cores, with up to 18 wt% at 300°F. Permeability measurements showed that GLDA performed better than HEDTA at a pH of 4 and at the same molar concentration. The optimum ratio of GLDA/HF concentration was found to be 20 wt% GLDA/1 wt% HF, which gives the maximum increase in core permeability. No deconsolidation was noted with the two chelates tested. The results obtained from this study will significantly improve the outcome of acid treatments in illitic sandstone reservoirs at high temperatures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it