MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076278798 · doi:10.1080/10618560701737203

Efficient multilevel restriction–prolongation expressions for hybrid finite volume element method

2008· article· en· W2076278798 on OpenAlexaff
Masoud Darbandi, Soheyl Vakili, G. E. Schneider

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational journal of computational fluid dynamics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComputational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultigrid methodProlongationApplied mathematicsFinite element methodMathematicsBilinear interpolationFinite volume methodSolverRelaxation (psychology)CompressibilityMathematical optimizationMathematical analysisPartial differential equationMechanicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A multigrid acceleration technique is suitably extended to solve the 2D incompressible Navier–Stokes equations using a fully implicit hybrid finite volume element method. As is known, the convergence of classical relaxation techniques performs an initial rapid decrease of residuals followed by a slower rate of decrease. This means that a relaxation procedure is efficient for eliminating only the high frequency components of the residuals. This problem can be overcome using a multigrid method. There are different restriction and prolongation operators to establish a multigrid procedure. An efficient operator is suitably extended in this work. It provides data during refining and coarsening stages using modified bilinear finite element interpolators. The extended formulations are then examined by solving a thermobuoyant flow problem, and the effects of using mid cell-face values in the extended restriction and prolongation operators are measured. The results indicate that the current formulation effectively improves the performance of the original fully implicit solver.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational journal of computational fluid dynamicsSame topicComputational Fluid Dynamics and AerodynamicsFrench-language works237,207