Polyamines mediate glutamine-dependent induction of the intestinal epithelial heat shock response
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Heat shock proteins (Hsps) are highly conserved proteins that play a role in cytoprotection and maintaining intestinal homeostasis. Glutamine is essential for the optimal induction of intestinal epithelial Hsp expression, but its mechanisms of action are incompletely understood. Glutamine is a substrate for polyamine synthesis and stimulates the activity of ornithine decarboxylase (ODC), a key enzyme for polyamine synthesis, in intestinal epithelial cells. Thus we investigated whether polyamines (putrescine, spermidine, or spermine) and their precursor ornithine mediate the induction of Hsp expression in IEC-18 rat intestinal epithelial cells. As previously observed, glutamine was required for heat stress induction of Hsp70 and Hsp25, although it had little effect under basal conditions. Under conditions of glutamine depletion, supplementation of ornithine or polyamines restored the heat-induced expression of Hsp70 and Hsp25. When ODC was inhibited by α-difluoromethylornithine (DFMO), an irreversible ODC inhibitor, the heat stress induction of Hsp70 and Hsp25 was decreased significantly, even in the presence of glutamine. Ornithine, polyamines, and DFMO did not modify the nuclear localization of heat shock transcription factor 1 (HSF-1). However, DFMO dramatically reduced glutamine-dependent HSF-1 binding to an oligonucleotide with heat shock elements (HSE), which was increased by glutamine. In addition, exogenous polyamines recovered the DNA-binding activity. These results indicate that polyamines play a critical role in the glutamine-dependent induction of the intestinal epithelial heat shock response through facilitation of HSF-1 binding to HSE.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".