Bibliographic record
Abstract
Satellite cells are small, mononuclear cells found in close association with striated skeletal muscles cells (myofibers). These cells appear to function as reserve myoblasts. A critical role for these cells in the process of muscle regeneration following injury has been clearly established. In that role, satellite cells have been shown to proliferate extensively. Some of the progeny of these cells then fuse with each other to form replacement myofibers, whereas others return to quiescence, thereby maintaining this reserve population. In response to injury, activated satellite cells can also fuse with damaged but viable myofibers to promote repair and regeneration. It has also been observed that satellite cells are activated during periods of significantly increased muscle loading and that some of these cells fuse with apparently undamaged myofibers as part of the hypertrophy process. The observation that the inactivation of satellite cell proliferation prevents most of the hypertrophy response to chronic increases in loading has lead to the hypothesis that a limitation to the expansion of myofiber size is imposed by the number of myonuclei present. Recent evidence suggests that a potential limitation to muscle hypertrophy, in the absence of a reserve supply of myonuclei, may be the inability to sustain increases in ribosomes, thereby limiting translational capacity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".