MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076302356 · doi:10.1149/1.3654224

Analysis of Aged Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell (PEFC) Components by Non Traditional Methods

2011· article· en· W2076302356 on OpenAlexaff
Renate Hiesgen, Ines Wehl, Stefan Helmly, K. Andreas Friedrich, Mathias Schulze, Andrea Haug, Xiao‐Zi Yuan, Haijang Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsBC Innovation CouncilNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicroporous materialNafionCathodeMembraneMaterials scienceIonic bondingElectrolytePolytetrafluoroethyleneChemical engineeringPolymerProton exchange membrane fuel cellIonic conductivityDiffusionFuel cellsCurrent collectorIonomerAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Composite materialChemistryElectrochemistryElectrodeChromatographyIonOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ageing of microporous layers (MPL) of fuel cell gas diffusion layers has been quantitavely analyzed using a special atomic force microscopy technique, namely the so-called HarmoniX technique. From the change of mean adhesion force under dry and wet conditions an increased loss of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) at the cathode was found. With ionic current measurement in tapping- and contact mode by AFM, activated Nafion was investigated before fuel cell operation with high resolution and individual ionic channels were imaged in one cluster. These measurements were compared to the current distribution of membranes after 1600 h of fuel cell operation under OCV. Distinct current levels were found which demonstrate the existence of an interpenetrating ionic network with different branches not directly connected at the surface. SEM/EDX investigations of the specially designed fuel cells indicate an important role of platinum in degradation of membranes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.702
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicFuel Cells and Related MaterialsFrench-language works237,207