Heisenberg-Kitaev model on the hyperhoneycomb lattice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Motivated by recent experiments on $\ensuremath{\beta}$-Li${}_{2}$IrO${}_{3}$, we study the phase diagram of the Heisenberg-Kitaev model on a three-dimensional lattice of tricoordinated Ir${}^{4+}$, dubbed the hyperhoneycomb lattice. The lattice geometry of this material, along with Ir${}^{4+}$ ions carrying ${J}_{\mathrm{eff}}=1/2$ moments, suggests that the Heisenberg-Kitaev model may effectively capture the low-energy spin-physics of the system in the strong-coupling limit. Using a combination of semiclassical analysis, exact solution, and slave-fermion mean-field theory, we find, in addition to the spin liquid, four different magnetically ordered phases depending on the parameter regime. All four magnetic phases---the N\'eel, the polarized ferromagnet, the skew-stripy, and the skew-zig-zag---have collinear spin ordering. The three-dimensional ${Z}_{2}$ spin liquid, which extends over an extended parameter regime around the exactly solvable Kitaev point, has a gapless Majorana mode with a deformed Fermi circle (codimensions, ${d}_{c}=2$). We discuss the effect of the magnetic field and finite temperature on different phases that may be relevant for future experiments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".