Finite‐difference 4th‐order compact scheme for the direct numerical simulation of instabilities of shear layers
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract An algorithm based on the 4th‐order finite‐difference compact scheme is developed and applied in the direct numerical simulations of instabilities of channel flow. The algorithm is illustrated in the context of stream function formulation that leads to field equation involving 4th‐order spatial derivatives. The finite‐difference discretization in the wall‐normal direction uses five arbitrarily spaced points. The discretization coefficients are determined numerically, providing a large degree of flexibility for grid selection. The Fourier expansions are used in the streamwise direction. A hybrid Runge–Kutta/Crank–Nicholson low‐storage scheme is applied for the time discretization. Accuracy tests demonstrate that the algorithm does deliver the 4th‐order accuracy. The algorithm has been used to simulate the natural instability processes in channel flow as well as processes occurring when the flow is spatially modulated using wall transpiration. Extensions to three‐dimensional situations are suggested. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it