Preliminary Characterization of Physical Properties of Cross-Laminated-Timber (CLT) Panels for Hygrothermal Modelling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Cross-laminated-timber (CLT) panels are a type of relatively new wood-based structural panel, typically manufactured by laminating three or more layers of lumber together, with each layer rotated 90° relative to the neighbouring layers. This study explored preliminary assessment of the physical properties of a range of specimens for the purpose of initiating generating material property data for hygrothermal simulation of CLT building enclosure assemblies. Three types of five-layer CLT panels (nominally 130 mm thick) were made with Canadian softwood species, including spruce-pine-fir (SPF) from Eastern Canada and British Columbia, and hem fir from British Columbia, all glued with emulsion polymer isocyanate (EPI) as the adhesive applied between neighbouring layers. One type of three-layer CLT (nominally 90 mm thick) commercially manufactured in Europe using European spruce, with polyurethane adhesive, was also tested. Physical properties including density, thermal conductivity, liquid-water absorption, water-vapor permeability, sorption (moisture storage function), and air permeability were measured, mostly based on established international standards. To assess the impact of the adhesive on the hygrothermal properties of CLTs, test specimens used for most tests included at least one layer of adhesive, except those used for sorption tests, which used very small specimens. The properties were expected to mostly reflect the properties of the lumber used for CLT manufacturing. Variations in properties were found among these different CLT specimens; however, it was generally concluded that the differences caused by wood species and manufacturing methods would not be large enough to cause considerable differences in the hygrothermal properties or significantly impact the outcomes of hygrothermal simulation. With small-scale testing and very limited replication this study showed that the water-vapor permeability of CLT generally increased with an increase in relative humidity (RH), and the air permeance of the CLT specimens without visible gaps and checks was negligible.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".