Haplotype Study of Intermediate-Length Alleles at the Fragile X (FMR1) Gene: ATL1, FMRB, and Microsatellite Haplotypes Differ from Those Found in Common-Size FMR1 Alleles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The CGG repeat within the X-chromosome-linked FMR1 gene, which in hyperexpansion (> 200 copies) results in fragile X syndrome, is highly polymorphic. The mechanism of expansion is not well understood, but CGG repeats called intermediate-length or gray zone alleles (approximately equal 35-60 repeats) are thought to make up the FMR1 alleles showing initial steps in this expansion process. It has been hypothesized that the background haplotype of these alleles plays a role in their susceptibility to expansion. In this study we investigate whether or not the frequencies of alleles and haplotypes at four marker loci in the FMR1 gene region (microsatellites DXS548 and FRAXAC1 and SNPs ATL1 and FMRb) in 84 intermediate-length male chromosomes differ from those in 94 common-size male alleles. The ATL1*G and FMRB*A alleles were more frequent among intermediate-length alleles than among common alleles. In addition, the DXS548-FRAXAC1 T50-T42 and T40-T42 haplotypes were strongly associated with intermediate-length alleles between 41 and 60 CGG repeats (p < 0.001). Two extended haplotypes, DXS548-FRAXAC1-ATL1-FMRb T50-T42-G-A and T40-T42-G-A, are strongly associated (p < 0.001) with intermediate-length alleles between 41 and 60 CGG repeats, and these haplotypes have also been reported as fragile X associated haplotypes in European populations. These data suggest that these haplotypes are among the most susceptible to further expansion among the intermediate-length alleles. T50-T42-G-A was also much more prevalent in males with 35-40 CGG repeats than in males with common-size alleles. ATL1 did not increase discrimination among intermediate-length alleles beyond that detected by DXS548-FRAXAC1 haplotypes, but the FMRb locus did, particularly for the DXS548-FRAXAC1-ATL1 T50-T42-G and T40-T42-G haplotypes. Comparison with fragile X associated haplotypes, from the literature, suggests that repeat hyperexpansion occurs most frequently on chromosomes carrying FMRB*A. Within the intermediate-length allele category, however, there were some significant differences in haplotype frequencies between smaller and larger alleles, and this finding has implications for future studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".