Lower Paleozoic configuration of the Quebec reentrant based on improved along-strike paleogeography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An improved paleogeography of the Quebec reentrant has been achieved by examining the nature and distribution of major sediment buildups within this reentrant. The Quebec reentrant has one side produced by rift faults and one side by a major transform fault. The Oak Hill Group was deposited near a triple-rift zone. Clastic sediments of this group formed a large delta that was fed by a major river flowing in the rift valley of the Ottawa graben. The delta must have prograded on a gentle slope platform. No other thick deltaic deposits are known towards the northeast. Instead, facies analyses favor the existence of a promontory near Québec. Still farther to the northeast, the Saguenay graben was not the product of a triple-rift junction. However, it served to funnel sediments to a deep-sea fan, and the adjacent platform was narrow with a steep slope. The lateral distribution of sediments from the Ordovician Taconic orogeny can be explained by this improved paleogeographic reconstruction. The configuration of the Quebec reentrant required the arc to move into the reentrant. The Taconian tectonic wedge progressively accreted the thick sediment buildups that were the Oak Hill delta and the Bas-du-Fleuve deep-sea fan. This allowed them to act as new barriers to orogenic sediment dispersal as the orogeny proceeded.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".