MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076533338 · doi:10.1029/2007jd008721

Validation of the Aura Microwave Limb Sounder HNO<sub>3</sub> measurements

2007· article· en· W2076533338 on OpenAlex
M. L. Santee, A. Lambert, W. G. Read, N. J. Livesey, R. E. Cofield, D. Cuddy, W. H. Daffer, Brian J. Drouin, L. Froidevaux, R. A. Fuller, R. F. Jarnot, B. Knosp, G. L. Manney, V. S. Perun, W. Van Snyder, P. C. Stek, R. P. Thurstans, Paul Wagner, J. W. Waters, Giovanni Muscari, R. L. de Zafra, J. E. Dibb, D. W. Fahey, Peter Popp, T. P. Marcy, K. W. Jucks, G. C. Toon, R. A. Stachnik, P. F. Bernath, C. D. Boone, Kaley A. Walker, J. Urban, D. Murtagh

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersTekesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCentre National d’Etudes Spatiales
KeywordsMicrowave Limb SounderStratosphereTroposphereEnvironmental scienceRemote sensingAltitude (triangle)Advanced Microwave Sounding UnitSatelliteAtmospheric soundingMesosphereAtmospheric sciencesMicrowaveMeteorologyGeologyPhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We assess the quality of the version 2.2 (v2.2) HNO 3 measurements from the Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS) on the Earth Observing System Aura satellite. The MLS HNO 3 product has been greatly improved over that in the previous version (v1.5), with smoother profiles, much more realistic behavior at the lowest retrieval levels, and correction of a high bias caused by an error in one of the spectroscopy files used in v1.5 processing. The v2.2 HNO 3 data are scientifically useful over the range 215 to 3.2 hPa, with single‐profile precision of ∼0.7 ppbv throughout. Vertical resolution is 3–4 km in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere, degrading to ∼5 km in the middle and upper stratosphere. The impact of various sources of systematic uncertainty has been quantified through a comprehensive set of retrieval simulations. In aggregate, systematic uncertainties are estimated to induce in the v2.2 HNO 3 measurements biases that vary with altitude between ±0.5 and ±2 ppbv and multiplicative errors of ±5–15% throughout the stratosphere, rising to ∼±30% at 215 hPa. Consistent with this uncertainty analysis, comparisons with correlative data sets show that relative to HNO 3 measurements from ground‐based, balloon‐borne, and satellite instruments operating in both the infrared and microwave regions of the spectrum, MLS v2.2 HNO 3 mixing ratios are uniformly low by 10–30% throughout most of the stratosphere. Comparisons with in situ measurements made from the DC‐8 and WB‐57 aircraft in the upper troposphere and lowermost stratosphere indicate that the MLS HNO 3 values are low in this region as well, but are useful for scientific studies (with appropriate averaging).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.224
Threshold uncertainty score0.370

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it