MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076579403 · doi:10.1021/nl015635q

Fabrication of Tetragonal Square Spiral Photonic Crystals

2001· article· en· W2076579403 on OpenAlexaff
Scott R. Kennedy, Michael J. Brett, Ovidiu Toader, Sajeev John

Bibliographic record

VenueNano Letters · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhotonic Crystals and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTetragonal crystal systemPhotonic crystalFabricationMaterials scienceSquare (algebra)OptoelectronicsSiliconBand gapOpticsDeposition (geology)Substrate (aquarium)PhotonicsSquare latticeNanotechnologyCrystal structureCrystallographyCondensed matter physicsChemistryPhysicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a simple, versatile technique for the fabrication of large, three-dimensional gap photonic crystals using glancing angle deposition (GLAD). A tetragonal lattice suitable for a large photonic band gap (PBG) can be synthesized by a regular array of square spiral structures grown from a simple, prepatterned substrate using physical vapor deposition and advanced substrate motion. Tetragonal square spiral crystals with a predicted PBG of up to 15% for a silicon structure can be produced in the visible, NIR, and IR spectrum. These PBG's exhibit good stability for large areas of parameter space that can be readily mapped out by the GLAD process through the variation of deposition parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations230
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNano LettersSame topicPhotonic Crystals and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207