Reactive pulsed laser deposition of high-<i>k</i> silicon dioxide and silicon oxynitride thin films for gate-dielectric applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have successfully developed two reactive pulsed laser deposition (PLD) processes for the growth of high-k SiO2 and SiOxNy thin films. At a KrF laser intensity of 3×108 W/cm2, both SiO2 and SiOxNy films have been deposited by ablating a silicon target in a reactive gas atmosphere (O2 and O2/N2 mixture, respectively) on both Si (100) and Pt-coated Si substrates. Two key issues are presented here, namely (i) the effect of the deposition temperature (Td in the 20–450 °C range) and (ii) the effect of the N incorporation (in the 0.3–20 at. % concentration range) on the microstructure and electrical properties of PLD SiO2 and SiOxNy thin films, respectively. For the PLD-SiO2 films, 300 °C has been identified as the optimal deposition temperature that yields stoichiometric ([O]/[Si]≈1.9), hydrogen-free films with a low local disorder, a highly dense microstructure and a dielectric constant (k) higher than that quoted for thermally grown SiO2. On the other hand, the PLD SiOxNy films containing 20 at. % of N have exhibited a dielectric constant as high as ∼7. A rather good agreement is obtained between the k values deduced from the Poole–Frenkel emission (PFE) model and those obtained from direct impedance measurements, confirming thereby that the PFE remains the predominant conduction mechanism in the PLD SiOxNy films.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".