MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076637369 · doi:10.4141/a01-031

Stress responses of wapiti (<i>Cervus elaphus canadensis</i>) to removal of velvet antler

2002· article· en· W2076637369 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
N.J. Cook, A. L. Schaefer

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Animal Science · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntlerCervus elaphusMedicineAnimal scienceAnalgesicElectroejaculationAnesthesiaInternal medicineEndocrinologyBiologyAndrologySemenEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An assessment of stress responses of 27 mature wapiti (Cervus elaphus canadensis) stags was conducted to test the efficacy of two methods of analgesia to reduce stress responses associated with the pain of cutting velvet antler. Analgesic methods were a Lidocaine nerve block (LIDO) and pedicle placement electrical analgesia (EA). A control group of animals (CON) was included that did not receive analgesia. Methods of assessing stress responses included heart and respiration rates, differential white blood cell counts and plasma cortisol. Assessment of stress responses also utilized infrared thermographic imaging and measurement of salivary cortisol concentrations. The latter measures were novel approaches to stress assessment in wapiti, and, as such, the study was a trial of their applicability. Measures were conducted over 2 d. Antler was harvested on day 1 and the animals were brought back to the handling facility 24 h later (day 2) for repeated measures. Heart and respiration rates were increased in response to cutting antler (P &lt; 0.05) and declined following antler removal (P &lt; 0.003). Reductions in eosinophils occurred over a 24-h period in all treatments and were statistically significant for the EA treatment (P &lt; 0.014). Plasma cortisol concentrations did not demonstrate statistical differences between either treatments or days. Plasma cortisol concentrations were numerically higher for the EA animals on days 1 and 2 than for either the CON or LIDO treatments. Plasma cortisol levels tended to be higher after capture and restraint on day 2 compared to levels recorded after antler removal on day 1. Salivary cortisol levels were higher on day 2 compared to day 1 (P &lt; 0.004). Between treatments, CON animals exhibited higher salivary cortisol levels on day 2 than EA (P &lt; 0.05) and LIDO (P &lt; 0.002) animals. Radiated heat loss, measured by infrared thermography, was significantly elevated in response to velveting (P &lt; 0.00001). Increased radiated heat loss was observed for all treatments and was statistically significant for EA (P &lt; 0.006) and CON (P &lt; 0.02), but not for LIDO (P &lt; 0.06). The study demonstrated that the process of harvesting velvet antler from wapiti initiates a significant stress response similar to that of other animals during practices such as capture, handling and restraint. The data further suggest that stress responses to the above husbandry practices are exacerbated by the pain of cutting antler and that animals treated with Lidocaine for pain management exhibited a lesser stress response than CON or EA treated animals. Key words: Wapiti, velvet antler, analgesia, stress, salivary cortisol, infrared thermography

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.920
Threshold uncertainty score0.980

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Animal ScienceSame topicAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesFrench-language works237,207