MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076661244 · doi:10.1071/rdv27n1ab248

248 IN VITRO EMBRYO PRODUCTION USING IN VIVO-MATURED OOCYTES COLLECTED TRANSVAGINALLY FROM WOOD BISON (BISON BISON ATHABASCAE)

2014· article· en· W2076661244 on OpenAlexaff
M. P. Cervantes, J. M. Palomino, M. Anzar, R.J. Mapletoft, Gabriela F. Mastromonaco, Gregory P. Adams

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsToronto ZooAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIn vitro maturationAndrologyBiologyOocyteReproductive technologyBison bisonEmbryo cultureEmbryoFollicular phaseFollicleBlastocystCryopreservationEmbryogenesisMedicineEndocrinologyEcologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reproductive technologies are being developed to help conserve the genetic diversity of wood bison, a threatened species. To date, the efficiency of in vitro embryo production in bison is very low and appears to be related to inadequate in vitro conditions for oocyte maturation. Recently, we have attempted to circumvent the problem by inducing oocyte maturation in vivo and found that more than one-third of superstimulated oocytes collected 30 h after administration of hCG were at metaphase II (Cervantes et al. 2013 Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 25, 283; Cervantes et al. 2014 Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 26, 199). We hypothesise that additional maturation time in vitro, after in vivo maturation, will allow the remaining oocytes to reach the MII stage, and thus improve in vitro embryo production in wood bison. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of an additional 4 h of in vitro maturation on the developmental competence of oocytes collected 30 h after hCG treatment. Wood bison cows (n = 24) were superstimulated by the administration of 300 mg of FSH (Folltropin-V) diluted in 0.05% hyaluronan on the day of follicular wave emergence and 100 mg of FSH in hyaluronan 2 days later. Bison were administered 2500 IU of hCG (Chorulon) IM 2 days after the last dose of FSH. Transvaginal ultrasound-guided follicle aspiration was performed 30 h after hCG treatment to collect cumulus-oocyte complexes (COC). Expanded COC (with no evidence of degeneration) were selected and assigned randomly to 2 groups (n = 38 COC/group) in which IVF was done immediately, or after 4 h of in vitro maturation in TCM 199 with 5% calf serum, 5 µg mL–1 pLH, 0.5 µg mL–1 pFSH, and 0.05 µg mL–1 gentamicin, at 38.5°C, 5% CO2 and high humidity. In vitro fertilization (Day 0) was done with frozen-thawed wood bison semen (dose 5 × 106 sperm mL–1) in Brackett-Oliphant medium at 38.5°C, 5% CO2, and high humidity. Presumptive zygotes were cultured in CR1aa plus 5% calf serum, at 38.5°C and in 5% CO2, 5% O2, and 90% N2 and high humidity. Cleavage was recorded on Day 3, and blastocyst formation was recorded on Days 7 and 8. Cleavage and blastocyst rates (calculated from the total number of oocytes submitted to IVF) were compared between groups by chi-square analysis. No difference was detected between groups (immediate fertilization v. after an additional 4 h in vitro) in cleavage rate on Day 3 (55.3 v. 60.5%, respectively, P = 0.82), or blastocyst rate on Day 7 (13.2 v. 23.7%, respectively, P = 0.37). However, the blastocyst rate on Day 8 was higher in the COC group exposed to an additional 4 h of in vitro maturation (18.4 v. 44.7%, respectively, P = 0.03). Results support the hypothesis that an additional short period of in vitro maturation improves the developmental competence of oocytes collected after 30 h of in vivo maturation. We thank Bioniche Animal Health for providing FSH (Folltropin-V) and hyaluronan (MAP-5), and Merck Animal Health for hCG (Chorulon).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207