Synthesis, structure, and reactivity of diamidophosphine complexes of yttrium and the lanthanides
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The reaction of the dilithiodiamidophosphine ligand precursor PhP(CH2SiMe2NPh)2Li2(THF)2([NPN]Li2(THF)2) with LnCl3(THF)3 (Ln = Y, Sm, Ho, Yb, Lu; THF = tetrahydrofuran) in refluxing toluene generates the mononuclear complexes [NPN]LnCl(THF) in good yield. The molecular structures have been shown to be five-coordinate in the solid state and in solution. Attempts to prepare alkyl derivatives have only met with partial success; the reaction of MeMgCl with [NPN]YCl(THF) generates the partially characterized mixed-metal derivative [NPN]YMe2MgCl. The reaction with LiAlH4 results in complete ligand exchange and the formation of the tetranuclear lithium aluminum hydride derivative {[NPN]AlH2Li(THF)}2. Reduction of the lutetium derivative with KC8 and naphthalene generated the dinuclear naphthalene-bridged species {[NPN]Lu}2(µ-η4:η4-C10H8) wherein each Lu centre engages in η4-coordination to opposite sides of the arene moiety. X-ray crystallography was used to characterize the four complexes.Key words: lanthanides, yttrium, mixed-donor ligands, aluminum, lithium, naphthalene.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".