Synthesis and characterization of nonaqueous dispersion particles with photolabile α‐heptadecylphenacyl ester stabilizer chains
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We describe a new method for the synthesis of core–shell photolabile nanoparticles. The synthesis begins with the batch emulsion copolymerization of n ‐butyl methacrylate (BMA) and ethylene glycol dimethacrylate to form small (20‐nm‐diameter) crosslinked particles with a narrow size distribution. These seeds are then used for a second‐stage emulsion copolymerizations in which BMA and various polar monomers, including methacrylic acid, are added under monomer‐starved conditions. After characterization of the particles, they are transferred to an N,N ‐dimethylformamide solution. The cesium salt of the carboxylic acid groups is reacted with 2‐bromo‐1‐phenyl‐octadecan‐1‐one to convert various fractions of the COOH groups to the corresponding 2‐benzoylheptadecyl ester groups. These aliphatic ester groups render the surface sufficiently hydrophobic that the particles can be dispersed in common aliphatic hydrocarbons solvents to yield colloidal dispersions, sterically stabilized by the dangling aliphatic chains. Ester groups with a phenyl ketone attached to the β‐carbon are photolabile. Irradiation of the particles with UV light detaches the sterically stabilizing chains from the particle and transforms the surface groups back to COOH groups. This leads to flocculation of the particles. The emphasis in this article is on the optimization of the particle synthesis and the characterization of the particles obtained. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 39: 2642–2657, 2001
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".