Endotoxin-induced heart dysfunction in rats: Assessment of myocardial perfusion and permeability and the role of fluid resuscitation*
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The pathophysiology of sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction is still controversial. Whether microcirculatory hypoperfusion together with capillary leakage can occur in the heart wall also remains a matter of debate. The objective was to evaluate the impact of fluid resuscitation on endotoxin-induced myocardial dysfunction. DESIGN: Adult rats were given intraperitoneal injection of endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide, Escherichia coli, 10 mg/kg) or phosphate-buffered solution, followed up by echocardiography and acetate micro-positron emission tomography scan imaging, together with final hemodynamic, biochemical, and pathologic evaluations up to 48 hrs. SETTING: University laboratory. SUBJECTS: Pathogen-free male Wistar rats (350 g). INTERVENTIONS: Influence of isovolumic fluid infusion type (saline vs. pentastarch) on these variables was assessed in 11 groups of six animals including an unchallenged control one. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Endotoxin injection induced a) myocardial dysfunction (decrease of approximately 15-20% in left ventricular ejection fraction); b) ventricular enlargement (approximately 1.5- to 1.7-fold increase in left ventricular systolic volume); c) cardiac output increase (10-15%); d) myocardial hypoperfusion ( approximately 1.5- to 2-fold decrease in acetate k1 constant rate); e) increased oxygen consumption (k2); and f) interstitial wall increase. Endotoxin injection also enhanced levels of arterial lactates and troponin I. Colloid (pentastarch) over crystalloid (saline) fluid resuscitation significantly reversed echocardiographic changes, some positron emission tomography imaging alterations, and lactate and troponin I levels without further enhancing interstitial spaces. CONCLUSION: Endotoxin can induce reversible myocardial alterations with evidence of coronary hypoperfusion and heart wall enlargement/damage, some of which can be prevented by fluid resuscitation. The use of crystalloids is less beneficial than pentastarch.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".