Paraspermatogenesis of Cerithioidean snails: Retention of an acrosome and nuclear remnant
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Paraspermatozoa of Cerithioidea are oligopyrenic with a central nuclear remnant surrounded by glycoprotein bodies and an anterior acrosome complex. Posteriorly, the parasperm have one long and several small flagella. Biosynthesis of proteins begins in the rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER), early in paraspermatogenesis, prior to the degradation of the nucleus. The breakdown of the nucleus has features characteristic of apoptosis but a nuclear remnant remains that is composed of intact DNA. The acrosome complex of parasperm is Golgi-derived, forming posteriorly and migrating anteriorly along the plasma membrane to the apex of the nuclear remnant as the paraspermatid matures. This mechanism of acrosome formation is similar to that in euspermiogenesis in neomenioid aplacophorans and neritid snails and is plesiomorphic to mollusks. However, eusperm acrosomes of Cerithioidea form differently. In the paraspermatid, small, dense granules secreted by the Golgi body fuse to form larger granular vesicles, many of which are released by exocytosis into the seminal fluid. These granular vesicles stain red with acridine orange at pH 7 under 489-nm light, indicating that they are lysosomes. The retention of a nuclear remnant and development of an acrosome complex in the parasperm of cerithioideans, as well as the secretion of lysosomes into the seminal fluid, suggests novel functions for these unusual germ cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".