MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076995038 · doi:10.4043/22054-ms

Enhanced Arctic Lifeboat Design and Operation

2011· article· en· W2076995038 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Aaron Barr, Al Browning, Esben Würtz Sørensen, Peter J. Schmidt, Charles McHardy

Bibliographic record

VenueOTC Arctic Technology Conference · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOffshore Engineering and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDaewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering
KeywordsCrewArcticShipyardOffshore drillingEngineeringMarine engineeringAeronauticsComputer scienceDrillingShipbuildingMechanical engineeringOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A drilling contractor has collaborated with operators, engineering firms, equipment manufacturers and a shipyard to develop the design and specifications for a mobile offshore drilling unit that is capable of working in both Arctic marine environments as well as in tropical environments. Emergency Escape and Recovery (EER) operations in an Arctic environment present unique challenges with regard to crew evacuation, equipment specification, vessel arrangement, and recovery operations for the broad theater of operations. Standard readily available solutions did adequately address the environmental and regulatory challenges. A solution was developed between equipment manufacturers and an operator and described herein. This paper addresses lifeboat operations in cold weather environments, which require special attention to life boat design, storage, location on the vessel, and recovery systems during transit and drilling operations. The specific Arctic lifeboat enhancements, Canadian State requirements, and description of the crew evacuation plan are included. Introduction The Canadian Arctic environment introduces challenges to emergency escape and rescue operations not normally encountered in the major drilling locations of the world. The presence of ice increases the complexity of EER equipment and operations. Hull crushing, engine cooling intake blockages, and obstacles seen or not seen are some of the physical difficulties ice introduces. Canadian state regulations add to this area of uncertainty, due to a lack of familiarity that must be addressed. This paper addresses these factors on how they influence crew evacuation, equipment design, and recovery operations by demonstrating them through an Arctic drillship design and specification. Background The Arctic operating locations for the vessel include the Alaskan Chukchi Sea, Alaskan Beaufort Sea, and Canadian Beaufort Sea. The environmental conditions include significant wave heights greater than that experienced in the Gulf of Mexico and ice. Ice may be present during the drilling season at any well site within these areas. Other environmental hazards include freezing fog, extended periods of darkness, freezing precipitation, and extremely low ambient temperatures. These conditions make possible a difficult worst case scenario for EER operations at the location of interest. The drilling location may be exposed to different degrees of ice during the drilling season and during transit into and out from the well site. Ice conditions range from no ice, to slush ice, to level first year ice with multi-year ice inclusions. Furthermore, wind and waves will interact with the ice to various degrees presenting impact and crushing hazards to the lifeboat. Temperatures in the location of interest vary in extremes. The cold weather condition presents the most difficult challenge to solve. Ambient outside temperatures may plunge to less than −50°C in the winter as shown in historical records of nearby weather stations. Crew exposure to the elements must be limited or removed when considering these low temperatures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.692
Threshold uncertainty score0.775

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOTC Arctic Technology ConferenceSame topicOffshore Engineering and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207