MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077001106 · doi:10.1139/s08-009

Application of carbon dioxide stripping for struvite crystallization — I: Development of a carbon dioxide stripper model to predict CO<sub>2</sub> removal and pH changes

2008· article· en· W2077001106 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Kazi Parvez Fattah, Y. Zhang, D. S. Mavinic, Frank-Thomas Koch

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Engineering and Science · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPhosphorus and nutrient management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlkalinityCarbon dioxideStripping (fiber)StruviteEffluentAerationChemistryPulp and paper industryVolumetric flow rateDecompositionEnvironmental engineeringWastewaterEnvironmental scienceMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research investigated the feasibility of stripping CO 2 from the digester supernatant to raise the pH, thereby reducing the caustic chemical usage. In this study, a cascade CO 2 stripper was first designed and tested, with three different synthetic solutions in a struvite recovery, crystal reactor: (1) tap water saturated with CO 2 , (2) NaHCO 3 solution saturated with CO 2 , and (3) NaHCO 3 + NH 4 Cl solution saturated with CO 2 . It was found that the removal efficiency of the CO 2 stripper was dependant on several parameters, such as the characteristics of the influent, including total alkalinity, temperature, and initial concentration of dissolved CO 2 gas, influent flow rate, effluent recycle rate, aeration rate, and baffle numbers in the stripper. Based on the performance of the stripper on the three synthetic solutions, a CO 2 stripping model was developed using these parameters. This model was subsequently tested in a pilot-scale facility, to predict the amount of CO 2 removal possible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.142
Threshold uncertainty score0.487

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Environmental Engineering and ScienceSame topicPhosphorus and nutrient managementFrench-language works237,207