Synovial Pathology in Camptodactyly-Arthropathy-Coxa Vara-Pericarditis Syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
At least 25 families with camptodactyly-arthropathy-coxa vara-pericarditis (CACP syndrome) have been reported, with descriptions of a distinctive synovial pathology based largely on light microscopy. Although described as "proliferative," with numerous multinucleated giant cells, the natures of proliferating cells and giant cells have not been determined. To clarify the pathogenesis of this disorder, we studied 3 patients who had CACP syndrome and underwent synovial biopsy. Cells in the biopsies were studied by immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy. Giant cells were identified as macrophage in origin based on CD68 expression and electron microscopic features of macrophages. Most cells in the synovium were CD68 positive, in keeping with macrophages. The degree of proliferation in synovial biopsies was estimated by MIB1 immunostaining, which showed that up to 30% of cells were cycling compared with fewer than 10% in control synovial biopsies. None of the giant cells was cycling. By double immunostaining, proliferating cells were determined to be fibroblastic synoviocytes rather than macrophages. Thus the proliferative synovitis in this CACP syndrome can be more accurately thought of as hypercellularity by infiltrating macrophages with a contribution by proliferating fibroblastic synoviocytes. The synoviocyte proliferation is likely a response to the underlying genetic mutations involving the proteoglycan-4 (or CACP) gene. The encoded protein normally acts as a lubricant and possibly controls cell proliferation. Loss of one or another of these functions may be a possible mechanism that leads to synoviocyte proliferation in this disease, but the exact pathophysiology leading to this change requires further study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".