Structure and Evolution of 4-Coumarate:Coenzyme A Ligase (4CL) Gene Families
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The phenylpropanoid enzyme 4-coumarate:coenzyme A ligase (4CL) plays a key role in general phenylpropanoid metabolism. 4CL is related to a larger class of prokaryotic and eukaryotic adenylate-forming enzymes and shares several conserved peptide motifs with these enzymes. In order to better characterize the nature of 4CL gene families in poplar, parsley, and tobacco, we used degenerate primers to amplify 4CL sequences from these species. In each species additional, divergent 4CL genes were found. Complete cDNA clones for the two new poplar 4CL genes were obtained, allowing examination of their expression patterns and determination of the substrate utilization profile of a xylem-specific isoform. Phylogenetic analysis of these genes and gene fragments confirmed previous results showing that 4CL proteins fall into two evolutionarily ancient subgroups . A comparative phylogenetic analysis of enzymes in the adenylate-forming superfamily showed that 4CLs, luciferases, and acetate CoA ligases each form distinct clades within the superfamily. According to this analysis, four Arabidopsis 4CL-like genes identified from the Arabidopsis Genome Project are only distantly related to bona fide 4CLs or are more closely related to fatty acid CoA ligases, suggesting that the three Arabidopsis 4CL genes previously characterized represent the extent of the 4CL gene family in this species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".