MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

042 EPICARDIAL POTENTIALS DERIVED FROM THE BODY SURFACE POTENTIAL MAP USING INVERSE ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY IMPROVE DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY

2013· article· en· W2077079425 on OpenAlexaff
Michael J. Daly, Dewar Finlay, Daniel Guldenring, P. J. Scott, A.A.J. Adgey, Mark Harbinson

Bibliographic record

VenueHeart · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyElectrocardiographyInternal medicineMyocardial infarctionRight bundle branch blockLeft bundle branch blockChest painBundle branch blockHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Epicardial potentials (EP) derived from body surface potentials using a thoracic volume conductor model (TVCM) improve acute myocardial infarction (AMI) diagnosis. In this study, we compared EP derived from the 80-lead body surface potential map (BSPM) using a TVCM developed from CT imaging with other electrocardiographic techniques in AMI diagnosis. Methods In this prospective study, consecutive patients presenting to both the ED and pre-hospital coronary care unit between August 2009 and August 2011 with acute ischaemic-type chest pain at rest were enrolled. At first medical contact a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) and BSPM were recorded. Cardiac troponin-T (cTnT) was sampled 12 h after symptom onset. AMI was diagnosed when cTnT ≥0.1 µg/l. Patients were excluded from analysis if they had bundle branch block, permanent pacemaker, left ventricular hypertrophy by voltage criteria or concomitant digitalis therapy. A cardiologist assessed the 12-lead ECG for STEMI by Minnesota criteria and the BSPM. BSPM ST-elevation (STE) was ≥0.2 mV in anterior, ≥0.1 mV in lateral, inferior, right ventricular (RV) or high right anterior and ≥0.05 mV in posterior territories indicating AMI. To derive EP, the 80-lead BSPM data were interpolated (Laplacian method) to yield values at 352-nodes of a Dalhouse torso. Using an inverse solution based on the boundary element method employing Tikhonov regularisation, EP at 98 cardiac nodes positioned within a standard TVCM were estimated. EP ≥0.3 mV defined STE. A cardiologist blinded to both the 12-lead ECG and BSPM interpreted the EP map. Results Enrolled were 400 patients (age 62±13 years; 57% male): 80 patients had exclusion criteria. Of the remaining 320 patients, 180 (56%) had AMI. Of these 180 patients, 117 had STEMI by Minnesota criteria (sensitivity 65%, specificity 89%) and 146 had BSPM STE (sensitivity 81%, specificity 90%). EP STE occurred in 158 patients (sensitivity 88%, specificity 95%, p<0.001). Of those with non-STEMI by Minnesota criteria on 12-lead ECG and AMI (n=63), 29 (46%) patients had STE detected by BSPM with a further 12 (19%) patients having STE detected only using EP derived from the BSPM using a TVCM. Overall, 41 (65%) patients with both a non-diagnostic 12-lead ECG at presentation and AMI had STE detected only by BSPM or derived EP. In 32/41 (78%) patients, STE was detected in the posterior or RV territories. All 41 patients had AMI diagnosed by EP. Conclusions Among those with an initial non-diagnostic 12-lead ECG, EP derived from BSPM using a TVCM significantly improves AMI diagnosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.633
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHeartSame topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasFrench-language works237,207