MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077130857 · doi:10.3354/meps193167

Influence of turbidity, food density and parasites on the ingestion and growth of larval rainbow smelt Osmerus mordax in an estuarine turbidity maximum

2000· article· en· W2077130857 on OpenAlex
Pascal Sirois, JJ Dodson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMarine Ecology Progress Series · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicParasite Biology and Host Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTurbiditySmeltBiologyEstuaryIngestionFisheryZoologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigated the impact of turbidity, food density and parasites on ingestion and growth rates of rainbow smelt larvae Osmerus mordax. These 3 variables were selected because of their potential to substantially ~nfluence the feeding success, growth, and the subsequent survival of smelt larvae. A laboratory experiment was first performed to evaluate, in turbulent conditions, the combined effects of turbidity and food density on the ingestion and growth rates of smelt larvae. A f~eld survey of the gut contents of larval smelt was conducted to directly estlmate ingestion rates in 2 different regions of the St. Lawrence estuarine turbidity maximum (ETM) exhibiting different levels of turbidity but otherwise sharing similar environmental conditions. This study demonstrated that lower energetic costs are incurred by larvae that exploit similar feeding conditions at higher turbidities. Larval rainbow smelt in the ETM fed during the coincidence of dayllght hours and flooding tide. Cestode parasites (genus Protocephalus) were found in the digestive tract of 38% of the larvae collected in the ETM. Parasitised larvae ingested half as much food as non-parasitised larvae. The decrease in feeding due to parasitism was associated with a reduced growth rate as suggested by the sign~ficantly lower standard lengths observed in parasitised larvae. Moreover, the size advantage of non-parasitlsed larvae is expected to be ampMied because larger larvae ingest proportionally more food than smaller larvae. We suggest that the impact of parasitism on larval survival and subsequent recruitment m flshes merits far more attention than afforded to date.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.458

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it