MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077237048 · doi:10.1002/qj.792

Nonlinear shallow‐water equations on the Yin‐Yang grid

2011· article· en· W2077237048 on OpenAlexaffabout
Abdessamad Qaddouri

Bibliographic record

VenueQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShallow water equationsGridNonlinear systemDiscretizationMathematicsApplied mathematicsMathematical analysisComputer scienceGeometryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The system of nonlinear shallow‐water equations (SWEs) is a hyperbolic system serving as a primary test problem for numerical methods used in modelling global atmospheric flows. In this article, the SWEs on a rotating sphere are solved on the Yin‐Yang grid by using a domain decomposition method (DDM). This overset grid is singularity free and has a quasi‐uniform grid spacing. It is composed of two identical latitude/longitude orthogonal grid panels that are combined to cover the sphere with partial overlap on their boundaries. On each of the two subgrids, the local solver is based on an implicit and semi‐Lagrangian discretization on a horizontally staggered Arakawa C mesh. The resulting positive definite Helmholtz problem is solved using a Schwarz‐type DDM known as the optimized Schwarz method, which gives better performance than the classical Schwarz method by using specific Robin or higher‐order transmission conditions. Finally, the standard shallow‐water test set is performed in order to show that the DDM solution for SWEs on the Yin‐Yang grid system can reproduce the global solution accurately on the sphere. This work represents a first step in the development of a three‐dimensional forecasting model on the Yin‐Yang grid. © 2011 Crown in the right of Canada. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.242
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological SocietySame topicMeteorological Phenomena and SimulationsFrench-language works237,207