Yikes! Are plant control and power assets safe from cyber-attacks?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There are several online monitoring techniques at facilities for critical equipment and asset management. In a world where automated control and power systems are vulnerable to cyber-attacks, Oil and Gas producers find themselves in the difficult position of trying to secure all of their mission critical assets. Although control and power device manufacturers have improved the security capability of their products, many production facilities have control and power assets that are several generations old. Most Oil and Gas Producers are currently, or have already formulated, migration plans to transition to the newer more capable devices. There is a catch. The greatest impediment which arises within the transition to more secure technologies is the lack of comprehensive or accurate installed control asset data. This paper will discuss several systems that have been used for a non-intrusive, scalable and widely applicable control and power asset information management solutions and how they support ISA 99, NIST 800-82 and IEC-62443. The facilities can be shown to provide continuous dynamic asset data and have also been provided for system health and condition monitoring of controls systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".