MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077260544 · doi:10.14740/jcgo.v3i3.232

A Rare Case of Histologic Benign Struma Ovarii With Distant Metastasis

2014· article· en· W2077260544 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Der‐Wei Hwu, Shan-Yin Tsai, Hon‐Man Chan, Yuwen Chen, Yu‐Chieh Chen, Pi‐Jung Hsiao

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMalignancyStruma ovariiMetastasisThyroglobulinPathologyScintigraphyThyroidOvarian tumorOvarian TeratomaOvaryTeratomaRadiologyOvarian cancerInternal medicineCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Struma ovarii (SO) is a rare variant of ovarian teratoma composed mainly of mature thyroid tissue. It is usually benign in histology. We present a case of benign SO with frequent recurrence and widespread extra-ovarian seeding. A 28-year-old woman was diagnosed initially with dermoid cysts over the right ovary. Over a 7-year period, frequent recurrence of ovarian tumor was accompanied by peritoneal strumosis and distant metastasis to liver and lung. Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO), total thyroidectomy (TT) and radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy were performed with successfully declining serum thyroglobulin. The patient remains on scheduled follow-up in clinic. Histologic benign SO to behave like biological malignancy with frequent recurrence and distant metastasis is exceptional. Tumor enriched expression of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and p53 protein may explain the risk of malignant behavior. There is still a lack of consensus on how to choose the optimal management for histologically benign SO with metastatic behavior. Based on our limited case experience, BSO is preferred. TT and RAI therapy is mandatory if persistence of elevated serum thyroglobulin and wide-seeding of the tumor was detected by I 131 whole body scintigraphy or fluorodeoxyglucose (PET-FDG) scan. J Clin Gynecol Obstet. 2014;3(3):108-113 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jcgo232w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.241
Threshold uncertainty score0.908

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Gynecology and ObstetricsSame topicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatmentFrench-language works237,207