Absence of signs of systemic involvement in four patients with bilateral multiple facial angiofibromas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Facial angiofibromas are a major diagnostic sign for tuberous sclerosis (TS) and MEN1, and the former is probably the first disease to be considered by a geneticist when such lesions are found. They occur in up to 90% of persons with TS and 40-80% of individuals with MEN1. Early onset facial angiofibromas that are not associated with any other systemic sign appear to be unusual, and their occurrence can leave the clinician with some uncertainty as to their significance, as well as how to proceed. In this article we describe four patients with what appear to be isolated, bilateral facial angiofibromas. We discuss the significance of these lesions with respect to the conditions in which they have been seen, review prior reports of apparently isolated angiofibromas, and provide some rough calculations as to how likely it would be for an underlying systemic condition to be overlooked after different levels of investigation have been performed. We also look at some aspects of the financial cost/benefit ratio of further investigation of TS beyond a clinical examination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".