MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

AN ECOLOGICAL BASIS FOR EXTRACELLULAR CARBONIC ANHYDRASE IN MARINE UNICELLULAR ALGAE

2001· article· en· W2077270417 on OpenAlexaff
Louis A. Hobson, Christine E. Hanson, Claire Holeton

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Phycology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal ecosystems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyAlgaeDiatomAlgal bloomCarbonic anhydraseBloomPhytoplanktonBotanyNutrientEcologyAutotrophEnzymeBacteriaBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Extracellular carbonic anhydrase (CAe) is expressed by many, but not all, autotrophic species of aquatic unicellular protists. We measured CAe activities in unicellular marine algae characteristic of either high nutrient spring, fall, and winter blooms or low nutrient summer populations to provide ecological/evolutionary information about the enzyme. Highest activities occurred in spring bloom and opportunistic diatoms exposed to long photoperiods (16 h) when pH was highest and CO2 was lowest. Lower activities were recorded for a fall‐bloom diatom exposed to the long photoperiod, and lowest values were found under all culture conditions for one diatom and a number of flagellated species typical of summer low nutrient environments. Other potential sources of variance in measurements of CAe activity were examined. Maximum activities of CAe were recorded for the diatom, Skeletonema costatum (Greville) Cleve, during late exponential phase of growth and within 8 h of the beginning of the photoperiod. We concluded that ecological factors are important in determining CAe activities in marine unicellular protists. Potential functions of CAe in the metabolism of marine unicellular algae are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of PhycologySame topicMarine and coastal ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207