Effects of Physically Effective Fiber on Chewing Activity and Ruminal pH of Dairy Cows Fed Diets Based on Barley Silage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of physically effective neutral detergent fiber (peNDF) content of dairy cow diets containing barley silage as the sole forage source on feed intake, chewing activity, and ruminal pH. The experiment was designed as a replicated 3 x 3 Latin square using 6 lactating dairy cows with ruminal cannulas. Cows were offered 1 of 3 diets (high, medium, and low peNDF) obtained using barley silage that varied in particle length: long (theoretical cut length of 9.5 mm), medium (equal proportions of long and fine silages), and fine (theoretical cut length of 4.8 mm). The peNDF contents were determined using the Penn State Particle Separator and were 13.8, 11.8, and 10.5%, for the high, medium, and low diets, respectively. The physical effectiveness factors (defined as proportion retained on 19- and 8-mm screens) for the long and fine silages were 0.84 and 0.68, respectively. Increased forage particle size increased intake of peNDF but did not affect intake of DM and NDF. Ruminating and total chewing time were linearly increased with increasing dietary peNDF. Mean ruminal pH, area between the curve and a horizontal line drawn at pH 5.8 or 5.5, and time that pH was below 5.8 or 5.5 were not affected by peNDF content. Intake of peNDF was not correlated to any chewing activity but proportion of long particles on the 19-mm sieve tended to be correlated to ruminating chews (r = 0.36) and ruminating time (r = 0.36). These results indicate that increasing the peNDF content of diets increases chewing time. However, increased chewing time does not always improve ruminal pH status. Increasing chewing time and thus increasing salivary secretion may not fully overcome the effects of feed digestion and the production of fermentation acids that lower rumen pH. The results suggest that dietary peNDF and fermentable OM intake are critical in regulating rumen pH. Dietary particle size, expressed as peNDF, was a reliable indication of chewing activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".