Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract X-ray intensity data for olshanskyite, Ca2[B3O3(OH)6]OH·3H2O, were collected from a crystal from the Fuka mine, Okayama Prefecture, Japan, using a PW1100 Philips single-crystal diffractometer. Olshanskyite is triclinic, a 7.953(4), b 9.873(9), c 7.362 (6) Å, α 111.00(7), β 94.65(7), γ 107.53(7)°, space group P1̅, Z = 2. The crystal structure was solved and refined to R = 0.017 for 3833 observed reflections and to R = 0.022 for all unique reflections (4419). The anionic group in the structure is a three-membered ring of boron–oxygen tetrahedra [B3O3(OH)6]3−. Two independent calcium atoms occur in a distorted square-antiprism coordination with five oxygen atoms from the borate group and three hydroxyl or H2O groups external to the borate cluster. The apparent discrepancies between the unit-cell parameters and the formula unit of olshanskyite resulting from the present research and those previously determined are attributed to two alternative interpretations of the same chemical and X-ray powder data. Analogies and differences between the crystal structure of olshanskyite and that of the analogous borate nifontovite Ca3[B3O3(OH)6]2·2H2O also are discussed. Olshanskyite must be classified as a neso-triborate, and its structure is based on finite borate clusters (FBB = 3□).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it