MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077383210 · doi:10.1021/jp311066y

Comparing Femtosecond Multiphoton Dissociative Ionization of Tetrathiafulvene with Imaging Photoelectron Photoion Coincidence Spectroscopy

2013· article· en· W2077383210 on OpenAlexaff
P. Mayer, David Staedter, Valérie Blanchet, Patrick Hemberger, András Bödi

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPhotochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersPaul Scherrer Institut
KeywordsPhotoionizationDissociation (chemistry)ChemistryIonAtomic physicsIonizationPhoton energyFemtosecondPhotodissociationIonic bondingPhotoemission spectroscopyX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)PhotonPhotochemistryPhysical chemistryPhysicsNuclear magnetic resonanceOpticsLaser

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we describe femtosecond photoionization and the imaging photoelectron photoion coincidence spectroscopy of tetrathiafulvene, TTF. Femtosecond photoionization of TTF results in the absorption of up to twelve 808 nm photons leading to ion internal energies up to 12.1 eV as deduced from the photoelectron spectrum. Within this internal energy a variety of dissociation channels are accessible. In order to disentangle the complex ionic dissociation, we utilized the imaging photoelectron photoion coincidence (iPEPICO) technique. Above the dissociation threshold, iPEPICO results show that the molecular ion (m/z = 204) dissociates into seven product ions, six of which compete in a 1.0 eV internal energy window and are formed with the same appearance energy. Ab initio calculations are reported on the possible fragment ion structures of five dissociation channels as well as trajectories showing the loss of C2H2 and C2H2S from high internal energy TTF cations. A three-channel dissociation model is used to fit the PEPICO data in which two dissociation channels are treated as simple dissociations (one with a reverse barrier), while the rest involve a shared barrier. The two lower energy dissociation channels, m/z = 146 and the channel leading to m/z = 178, 171, 159, 140, and 127, have E0 values of 2.77 ± 0.10 and 2.38 ± 0.10 eV, respectively, and are characterized by ΔS(‡)(600 K) values of -9 ± 6 and 1 ± 6 J K(-1) mol(-1), respectively. Competing with them at higher internal energy is the cleavage of the central bond to form the m/z = 102 fragment ion, with an E0 value of 3.65 ± 0.10 eV and ΔS(‡)(600 K) = 83 ± 10 J K(-1) mol(-1).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.743

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry ASame topicPhotochemistry and Electron Transfer StudiesFrench-language works237,207