MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077522085 · doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.12.067

Is mitral valve surgery safe in octogenarians?☆

2005· article· en· W2077522085 on OpenAlexaff
Jayan Nagendran, Colleen M. Norris, Andrew Maitland, Arvind Koshal, David B. Ross

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsCalgary General HospitalFoothills Medical CentreUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Alberta HospitalAlberta Hospital Edmonton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSurgeryMitral valveProportional hazards modelIncidence (geometry)Diabetes mellitusCardiologyMitral valve repairCardiac surgeryHazard ratioInternal medicineConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes of mitral valve surgery in octogenarians. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively from January 1996 to March 2004 at two surgical centers. Of 1386 consecutive patients with mitral valve surgery, 58 (4.2%) were aged > or = 80 years. Survival data were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards modeling and Kaplan-Meier actuarial log rank statistics. RESULTS: Octogenarians were similar to younger patients for the presence of pre-operative hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, and smoking history. Octogenarians had a higher incidence of cerebrovascular disease (19.0 versus 7.8%, P = 0.003), urgent in-hospital surgery (55.2 versus 28.6%, P < 0.001), and presence of ischemic disease requiring combined mitral valve plus revascularization surgery (72.4 versus 41.0%, P < 0.001). Mitral valve repair was performed in a similar proportion of octogenarians and younger patients (44.8 versus 45.6%). Thirty-day mortality for octogenarians was significantly higher than younger patients (15.5 versus 5.6%, P = 0.002), and actuarial survival of octogenarians was significantly decreased (P = 0.009). However, 52.3% of the octogenarians were alive at 7-years following surgery. Independent predictors of mortality from multivariate risk adjusted modeling of the entire cohort were: emergency surgery (hazards ratio [HR] = 2.94, P < 0.001), combined mitral valve plus revascularization surgery (HR = 2.27, P < 0.001), mitral valve replacement (HR = 1.85, P < 0.01), and age > or = 80 years (HR = 1.80, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Octogenarians undergoing mitral valve surgery have significantly greater incidence of urgent surgery, ischemic disease requiring combined revascularization surgery, and have decreased rates of survival. While caution is required when operating on these higher risk elderly patients, overall 52.3% of the octogenarians are alive at 7-years following surgery, which is greater than the survival of octogenarians in the community. The greatest survival benefit within octogenarians occurred when mitral valve repair was possible over replacement. Further study will more clearly define subgroups of octogenarians with potentially greater benefit from mitral valve surgery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.185
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.011
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic SurgerySame topicCardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207