MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077582105 · doi:10.1139/y10-063

Apocynin attenuates pressure overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy in rats by reducing levels of reactive oxygen species

2010· article· en· W2077582105 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jinjun Liu, Juan Zhou, Wenjiao An, Yuanxi Lin, Yu-Bai Yang, Weijin Zang

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsApocyninNADPH oxidaseInternal medicineNOX4EndocrinologyReactive oxygen speciesPressure overloadAngiotensin IIMuscle hypertrophyVentricleChemistryBlood pressureOxidative stressMedicineCardiac hypertrophyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It has been shown that angiotensin II (Ang II) is involved in cardiac remodeling mediated by NADPH oxidase-dependent reactive oxygen species (ROS). Accordingly, NADPH oxidase-dependent ROS may play a role in cardiac hypertrophy induced by pressure overload. In the present study, we sought to determine whether inhibition of NADPH oxidase prevents cardiac hypertrophy. After abdominal aorta banding to induce cardiac hypertrophy, rats were treated for 8 weeks with apocynin (Apo) or captopril (Cap). Measures of cardiac hypertrophy were evaluated. Treatment with Cap or Apo reduced the left ventricle/body weight ratio (LV/BW), LV transnuclear myocyte diameter, and atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) mRNA expression relative to those of untreated rats subjected to aorta banding. The activity of NADPH oxidase and the ROS levels were decreased in treated animals. Cap, but not Apo, decreased Ang II levels and inhibited expression of p22phox and p67phox in LVs. In conclusion, local expression of Ang II appears to contribute to pressure overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy by upregulating NADPH oxidase expression and promoting ROS synthesis. Inhibition of NADPH oxidase and elimination of ROS may prevent or repair damage due to cardiac hypertrophy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.555

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Physiology and PharmacologySame topicCardiac Ischemia and ReperfusionFrench-language works237,207