All‐atom Molecular Dynamic Simulations Combined with the Chemical Shifts Study on the Weak Interactions of Ethanol‐water System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract All‐atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulation combined with chemical shifts was performed to investigate the interactions over the entire concentration range of the ethanol (EtOH)‐water system. The results of the simulation were adopted to explain the NMR experiments by hydrogen bonding analysis. The strong hydrogen bonds and weak C–H···O contacts coexist in the mixtures through the analysis of the radial distribution functions. And the liquid structures in the whole concentration of EtOH‐water mixtures can be classified into three regions by the statistic analysis of the hydrogen‐bonding network in the MD simulations. Moreover, the chemical shifts of the hydrogen atom are in agreement with the statistical results of the average number hydrogen bonds in the MD simulations. Interestingly, the excess relative extent of ηrelE calculated by the MD simulations and chemical shifts in the EtOH aqueous solutions shows the largest deviation at xEtOH≈0.18. The excess properties present good agreement with the excess enthalpy in the concentration dependence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".