Bibliographic record
Abstract
We studied the importance of selection and constraint in determining the limits of adaptive radiation and the consequences of adaptive radiation in an experimental system. We propagated four replicate lines of the bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens derived from a single ancestral clone in 95 environments, where growth was limited by the availability of a single carbon source for 1,000 generations. We then assayed the growth of the ancestral clone and the evolved lines in all 95 environments. Evolved lines increased their performance in almost every selection environment and invaded 70% of the novel environments as a direct response to selection. Direct responses tended to be larger in environments where growth was initially poor. Although evolved lines lost the ability to grow on about three substrates that their ancestor could readily grow on, the correlated response to selection was, on average, positive. The correlated response allowed all of our evolved populations to expand their niches and to occupy collectively the remaining novel habitats. This is inconsistent with classical theories of niche evolution. In the most extreme cases, adaptation occurred through "roundabout selection": lineages became adapted to an environment through selection in another environment but not through selection in the environment itself. Our results indicate that mutation accumulation by neutral drift was responsible for generating the majority of costs of adaptation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".