Variability in the PR and RT Genes of HIV-1 Isolated from Recently Infected Subjects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To study variability in reverse transcriptase (RT) and protease (PR) genes of HIV-1 isolated from recently infected patients identified between 1997 and 2003, sequences were obtained on the RT and PR genes of viruses harvested from plasma of 121 non-treated subjects who had undergone primary HIV infection. The degree of dissimilarity between the viruses studied and a reference HIV-1 subtype B strain (LAV-1) was calculated for each of RT and PR by counting all of the nucleotide substitutions that could be identified. Mutations associated with drug resistance were excluded from analysis. We observed a mean percentage of variation in the RT and PR genes of the viruses analysed of 0.42% between the years 1997--2003 (P<0.01). In PR, the mean variation was 0.71% (P<0.05), while that in RT was 0.3% (P<0.05). Increased diversity was also observed among nucleotides conferring amino-acid changes, although no significant differences in patterns of nucleotide substitutions were apparent over the period of analysis. In conclusion, variability in the RT and PR genes of viruses from recently infected patients has increased over time in a manner that is independent of variability attributable to HIV drug resistance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".