MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077627878 · doi:10.1159/000244427

Rescue High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation for Preterm Infants: Neurodevelopmental Outcome and Its Prediction

2009· article· en· W2077627878 on OpenAlexaff
Po‐Yin Cheung, Wannarad Prasertsom, Neil N. Finery, Charlene M.T. Robertson

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of the Neonate · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsGlenrose Rehabilitation HospitalUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBronchopulmonary dysplasiaMedicineBayley Scales of Infant DevelopmentGestational agePediatricsIntraventricular hemorrhageBirth weightLow birth weightMechanical ventilationIncidence (geometry)Ventilation (architecture)AnesthesiaPregnancyCognitionPsychomotor learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The role of rescue high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFO) in treating very-low-birth-weight neonates with severe respiratory failure in relation to neurodevelopmental outcome has not been evaluated. We performed a retrospective cohort study on 21 patients (out of 52 consecutively admitted preterm neonates with gestational age < or = 30 weeks and birth weight < or = 1.250 g; mortality rate 60%) rescued with HFO between October 1988 and August 1993. Neurodevelopment, including Bayley Scales in Infant Development, was assessed at 12-61 (mean 28.5) months adjusted age. Thirteen normal (scores better than 2 SD below mean, and no sensory or motor disability) (62%) and neurodevelopmentally disabled children (38%) survived more than 1 year for developmental assessment. The mental and performance developmental indices were 94 (78-117) and 89 (68-110), and 63 (49-102) and 49 for the 13 normal and 8 disabled children, respectively (both p < 0.05). The incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH; grade 3 or 4), growth retardation, developmental scores and disabilities of these 21 HFO survivors were not significantly different from that of a birth-weight- and gestational-age-matched comparison group. While all HFO survivors had significant improvement in oxygenation 12 and 24 h after starting HFO, FiO2 and the alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient (A-aDO2) decreased significantly 1 h after starting HFO in survivors with normal neurodevelopmental outcome. The lack of initial response to HFO (20% decrease in A-aDO2 1 h after starting HFO) and the presence of grade 3 or 4 IVH predicted neurodevelopmental disability with a sensitivity of 63%, a specificity of 100%, and positive and negative predictive values of 100 and 81%, respectively. We concluded that HFO could be used as a rescue treatment in sick preterm neonates. The lack of early improvement in oxygenation and the presence of grade 3 or 4 IVH can predict adverse early childhood neurodevelopment in such neonates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.613
Threshold uncertainty score0.283

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiology of the NeonateSame topicNeonatal Respiratory Health ResearchFrench-language works237,207