MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077657222 · doi:10.1021/ac051609r

Measurement of Desorption Rates from Octadecylsilyl Bonded-Phase HPLC Particles and Its Characterization in Terms of Pore, Surface, and Film Diffusion

2006· article· en· W2077657222 on OpenAlexaff
Robert Bujalski, Frederick F. Cantwell

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytical Chemistry · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAnalytical Chemistry and Chromatography
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryDiffusionDesorptionAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Volumetric flow ratePhase (matter)ChromatographyAdsorptionThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An instrument is developed to measure rates of desorption of solutes from particulate HPLC packing materials for processes that are quantitatively complete in a few tenths of a second. The instrument is a modified, pressure-driven, stopped-flow device. The major modifications include positioning a very short (0.6 mm) bed of the particles just upstream of the detector cell, eliminating the mixing chamber, and adding high-speed switching valves in order to allow sequential continuous flow of individual solutions. Instantaneous rate curves are measured for the desorption of 1,2-dimethyl-4-nitrobenzene (DMNB) from 12-microm-diameter porous particles of the bonded-phase packing Luna C-18 employing high linear velocities of the eluting solvent. The same experiment is performed for the nonsorbed compound phloroglucinol (PG) The PG rate curve is used in two ways (i.e., subtraction and deconvolution) in order to correct the observed rate curve of DMNB for experimental artifacts such as bed hold-up volume and instrument band broadening. The cumulative desorption rate curve of DMNB is obtained by integration. It is accurately described (R2 > 0.999) by a theoretical model that invokes both intraparticle diffusion (including both hindered pore diffusion and surface diffusion) and external film diffusion. The surface diffusion coefficient is (3.2 +/- 0.8) x 10(-6) cm(2)/s and the diffusion film thickness is 0.5 microm. The validity, of both the experimental technique and the theoretical model, is demonstrated by excellent agreement between a predicted and an observed chromatographic elution peak for DMNB on a 25-cm-long commercial column of Luna C-18.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.107
Threshold uncertainty score0.854

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnalytical ChemistrySame topicAnalytical Chemistry and ChromatographyFrench-language works237,207