Space-time codes in wireless communications
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The need to provide reliable high data rate communication over the wireless channel has led to the development of efficient modulation and coding schemes. Diversity (time, frequency, space, polarization, angle) is an effective method to combat fading and improve the link reliability of the wireless channel. Time and frequency diversity lead to loss in bandwidth efficiency. However, by employing multiple antennas at the transmitter and/or at the receiver, spatial diversity mitigates fading without sacrificing the precious bandwidth resource. It is difficult to implement receive diversity in the downlink because of size and power limitations on the portable/mobile terminal. This has motivated the use of transmit diversity schemes wherein multiple antennas are used at the transmitter for the downlink transmission from the base station to the portable terminal. In space-time coding, intelligent coding of symbols across space and time can be done to reap the advantages due to coding and diversity. The coding in space is obtained by using multiple antennas at the transmitter. The article discusses aspects of space-time coding. This is an important research topic in the design of emerging wireless systems. Deployment of wireless systems using space-time codes is expected in the near future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it