Use of dietary feather meal to induce histidine deficiency or imbalance in dairy cows and effects on milk composition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Removing His from a postruminal AA infusion decreases milk protein and increases milk fat content. Feather meal is an inexpensive protein source, high in rumen undegradable protein but low in His. The objective of our study was to investigate dietary feather meal as a method for creating a His deficiency or imbalance to alter milk composition. Four dietary treatments were fed for 4 wk each to 8 multiparous mid-lactation Holstein cows in a replicated 4 × 4 Latin square design. A standard-protein control diet (SP-C) was formulated to provide 3,100g/d of metabolizable protein (MP). Feather meal was added to the control diet either to replace the MP isonitrogenously (SP-FM) or to increase the MP supply to 3,484 g/d (HP-FM). As an isonitrogenous control for HP-FM, a high-protein diet (HP-C) was formulated with His-adequate protein sources to provide the same MP content as HP-FM. Dry matter intake tended to decrease when feather meal was fed. Predicted flows of digestible His, Met, and Lys, and plasma concentrations of these AA were reduced on both feather meal diets. Predicted flows of total digestible essential AA were not different between HP-FM and SP-C. We concluded that the DMI depression on HP-FM prevented an imbalance of excess AA over His, and created a deficiency of His, Met, and Lys compared with SP-C. Milk production decreased on the 2 feather meal treatments, partly explained by a tendency for DMI to decrease. Milk yield was lowest on SP-FM at 30.3 kg/d and highest on HP-C at 37.9 kg/d. Milk fat yield was not affected by diet but protein and lactose yields were both lower with feather meal. Protein yields were 860 and 998 g/d, whereas lactose yields were 1,384 and 1,561 g/d for SP-FM and HP-FM, respectively. This resulted in a higher fat content and lower protein percentage on FM diets. The ratio of solids-not-fat:fat in milk was lowest on SP-FM at 2.11 compared with 2.56 on SP-C. Adding feather meal to the diet by replacing MP isonitrogenously was more effective at lowering the solids-not-fat:fat ratio than increasing the MP content with an imbalanced protein source.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".