RBP1 Family Proteins Exhibit SUMOylation-Dependent Transcriptional Repression and Induce Cell Growth Inhibition Reminiscent of Senescence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The retinoblastoma binding protein 1 (RBP1) appears to be an important factor in the repression of E2F-dependent transcription by the retinoblastoma protein (pRB) family. The recent identification of the breast carcinoma associated antigen (BCAA) as an RBP1-like protein led us to investigate its biological properties and compare them to RBP1. Like RBP1, BCAA contains a carboxy-terminal R2 domain that elicits histone deacetylase (HDAC)-dependent transcriptional repression via interactions with the SAP30 subunit of the Sin3/HDAC complex. Each RBP1 family member also contains two HDAC-independent repression activities within a region termed R1, which can be subdivided into a SUMOylated moiety (R1sigma) and a predicted alpha-helical region (R1alpha). R1alpha is embedded within the ARID region and represses basal transcription only, whereas R1sigma represses both basal and activated transcription and depends on SUMOylation. Overexpression of either RBP1 or BCAA, but not the truncated BCAAMCF-7 isoform that is overexpressed in breast cancer cells, caused a profound inhibition of cell proliferation and induced expression of a senescence marker. In each case the presence of both R1 and R2 was necessary for suppression of cell growth, suggesting that both R1 and R2 transcriptional repression activities play a role in RBP1 family protein-mediated regulation of cellular proliferation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".