Bethanechol and <i>N</i>-acetylcysteine mimic feeding signals and reverse insulin resistance in fasted and sucrose-induced diabetic rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Meal-induced insulin sensitization (MIS) is explained by the HISS (hepatic insulin sensitizing substance) hypothesis. In the presence of two "feeding signals," a pulse of insulin results in the release of HISS from the liver. HISS acts selectively on skeletal muscle and doubles the response to insulin. HISS is not released in the fasted state or in the sucrose-supplemented diabetes model. We tested the hypothesis that provision of both feeding signals allows insulin to cause HISS release in both the normal fasted and the diabetic model. The dynamic response to insulin (50 mU/kg over 5 min) was quantified using the rapid insulin sensitivity test (RIST). Gastric injection of a liquid test meal or i.v. administration of N-acetylcysteine in 24 h fasted rats raised hepatic glutathione to a similar degree (by 46%-47%). Hepatic denervation in fed rats eliminated the parasympathetic signal and eliminated MIS, and bethanechol completely restored MIS. Both compounds administered together allowed insulin to stimulate HISS release in 24 h fasted rats and in a diabetic model (9-week, 35% liquid sucrose supplement). Neither was effective alone. Both "feeding signals" are necessary and sufficient for insulin to stimulate HISS release.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".